The US cities with the most affordable rent in 2026
Not every city is built the same, and that’s also true of rental markets.
While some cities are seeing cooling rents and more affordable housing efforts, rent prices in others continue to rise.
A recent WalletHub study ranked 182 US cities, including the 150 most populous cities in the country and at least two of the most populous in each state, by how much renters spend on rent, on average.
To calculate the share of income spent on rentWalletHub used US Census Bureau data on median annual gross rent and median household income for each surveyed city.
“A general rule of thumb is that rent should not exceed 30% of the median income,” Maggie Rong Hu, an assistant professor of real estate at Baruch College in New York, said in the study. “This ensures that renters can comfortably afford their housing without sacrificing other essential living expenses.”
On average, people living in the 31 cities listed below spend about 18.5% of their income on rent, lower than the 23.46% across all measured cities.
In the most expensive cities in the study, including Miami, Detroit, and Newark, renters can spend up to 33.8% of their income on rent.
See the most affordable cities for renters across the US in 2026.
30. (Tie) Lexington-Fayette, Kentucky
Grindstone Media Group/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 20.10%
30. (Tie) South Burlington, Vermont
vermontalm/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 20.10%
29. Chesapeake, Virginia
trekandshoot/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 19.96%
28. Amarillo, Texas
Dani California Dreamin/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 19.88%
27. Des Moines, IA
Jacob Boomsma/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 19.84%
26. Oklahoma City
Sean Pavone/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 19.75%
25. Plano, Texas
Jacob Boomsma/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 19.68%
24. Seattle
SCStock/Getty Images
Income spent on rent: 19.67%
23. West Valley City, Utah
Joseph Sohm/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 19.57%
22. Fort Wayne, Indiana
Nicholas J Klein/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 19.52%
21. Omaha, Nebraska
Jacob Boomsma/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 19.46%
20. Fremont, California
NorCalStockMedia/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 19.39%
19. Fort Smith, Arkansas
Jonathan C Wear/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 19.35%
18. Laredo, Texas
Jacob Boomsma/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 19.34%
17. Huntsville, Alabama
Sean Pavone/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 18.81%
16. Rapid City, South Dakota
Jacob Boomsma/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 18.78%
15. Columbia, Maryland
Gyro Captain Drone Photos/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 18.64%
14. Billings, Montana
trekandshoot/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 18.53%
13. Warwick, Rhode Island
Wangkun Jia/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 18.44%
12. Lincoln, Nebraska
Sean Pavone/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 18.13%
11. Wichita, Kansas
Jacob Boomsma/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 18.11%
10. Overland Park, Kansas
Jacob Boomsma/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 17.34%
9. Anchorage, Alaska
TripWalkers/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 17.30%
8. Casper, Wyoming
Jacob Boomsma/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 17.24%
7. Juneau, Alaska
Alexandre.ROSA/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 17.04%
6. Cheyenne, Wyoming
Jacob Boomsma/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 17.02%
5. Fargo, North Dakota
Jacob Boomsma/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 16.94%
4. Charleston, West Virginia
Mihai_Andritoiu/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 16.56%
3. Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Sean Pavone/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 16.48%
2. Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Jacob Boomsma/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 16.35%
1. Bismarck, North Dakota
Jacob Boomsma/Shutterstock
Income spent on rent: 15.29%
