Sunni Islam: A Death Cult Designed to Fail

In September 2023, two of the most prominent Sunni Muslim voices on social media, Daniel Haqiqatjou and Jake Brancatella, had a debate on the Patrick Bet-David Podcast against two Christians, Robert Spencer and Brother Rachid, who was a Christian convert from Islam. According to Sunni Islam, the punishment for apostasy is death.

Ibn ‘Abbas said: “The Messenger of Allah said: ‘Whoever changes his religion, kill him.’”

أَخْبَرَنَا عِمْرَانُ بْنُ مُوسَى، قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الْوَارِثِ، قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا أَيُّوبُ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، قَالَ قَالَ ابْنُ عَبَّاسٍ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏ “‏ مَنْ بَدَّلَ دِينَهُ فَاقْتُلُوهُ ‏”‏ ‏.‏

Sunan an-Nasa’i 4059
https://sunnah.com/nasai:4059

In the discussion, Daniel and Jake were asked point-blank whether they would institute the apostasy law in the Hadith if they could, and whether Brother Rachid should be put to death; both, without hesitation, confirmed they would, with Daniel saying that he would also apply this to blasphemy as well.

While most sensible people were outraged by their comments, their followers cheered. Thinking, finally, someone willing to speak the “truth” without compromise, without bowing to Western sensibilities. Real Islam, they called it. Unapologetic. Strong.

Then something beautiful and terrible happened: The machine turned on itself.

Fast-forward to 2025, and Daniel and Jake had a very public falling-out, with each side considering the other to be out of the fold of Sunni Islam. These two champions of orthodox Sunni Islam were at each other’s throats. Not a polite disagreement. Not a scholarly debate. A full-blown public war where each side declared the other guilty of apostasy.

Daniel called Jake and his crew modern-day Khawarij—a fanatical sect that, according to Sunni Islamic tradition, should be fought and killed. He compared them to ISIS, suggested they were connected to terrorist attacks, and accused them of wanting to “kill millions of Muslims and enslave their women.”

Jake fired back, declaring Daniel a “shirk (idol worship) apologist”—which is no different than saying that he is upon the worst form of disbelief and should be executed according to their creed. Jake organized 35 prominent Muslim activists to sign an open letter, which accused him of “undermining the foundation of monotheism itself.”

Bismillāhir Raḥmānir Raḥeem

12/21/2025

Statement Regarding Daniel Haqiqatjou

The undersigned wish to issue the following brief statement concerning Daniel Haqiqatjou, founder of the Muslim Skeptic platform.

Over the past year, Haqiqatjou has become a significant liability to the effort of the daʿwah to Islam. He has demonstrated malicious intent toward fellow Muslim callers to the faith and poses a risk to his followers and those associated with him through his misguidance.

The most serious concerns relate to his repeated undermining of core matters of tawḥid (monotheism). He has justified positions that amount to shirk (polytheism) as valid, including claims that certain classical Sunni scholars held that the Prophet – peace be upon him – exercises control over all atoms of the universe.¹ He has also downplayed other polytheistic practices, such as offering sacrifices to jinn² and praying for healing directly from Jesus – peace be upon him – ,³ despite these acts constituting clear
shirk.

Tawḥid forms the foundation of the first pillar of Islam. Haqiqatjou’s rhetoric and apparent validation of such practices are gravely dangerous to his audience and undermine the very essence of the call to Islam.

In response to public criticism from fellow duʿāt, he has retaliated by leveling baseless accusations, identifying them as Khawārij in a documentary⁴ and invoking a hadith in which the Prophet – peace be upon him – exhorted fighting and killing the Khawārij.⁵ He has, in some instances, attempted to link certain duʿāt to ISIS attacks, including the Bondi Beach shootings⁶ and the Mar Elias Greek Orthodox Church bombing.⁷ Haqiqatjou has gone as far as to accuse some duʿāt of wanting to kill millions of Muslims and wanting to enslave their women as concubines.⁸

Furthermore, ideological criticisms from Muslim duʿāt towards him are dismissed as psychological operations orchestrated by Israeli intelligence and “Abraham Accord” regimes,9 referring to those critics as “Zio agents.”10

These accusations appear designed to incite hatred among his followers, and the broader public, deliberately endangering their safety and well-being.

In light of the foregoing, the undersigned hereby unequivocally disassociate from Daniel Haqiqatjou and advise the Muslim community to avoid relying on him as a source of religious knowledge.

 Abbas (EF Dawah)
 Abdul Rahman (Thought Adventure Podcast)
 Abdur Raheem McCarthy
 Abu Ibrahim (One Message Foundation / Quran al-Majeed Foundation)
 Abu Zakariya (Many Prophets One Message)
 Adnan Rashid
 Ali Dawah
 Ali Hassan Khan
 Anis (EF Dawah)
 Bassam Zawadi
 Ehsan al-Aqadi
 Farid Responds
 Fawad (DotsConnected2Islam)
 Full Metal Theist
 Hashim (DawahWise)
 Ibrahim (Proving Islam)
 Ibrahim bin Mahmud
 Ijaz (EF Dawah)
 Imran (EF Dawah)
 Jake Brancatella (The Muslim Metaphysician)
 Jordan M
 Karim Abu Zaid
 Liban Ahmed
 Mansur (DawahWise)
 Mohammed Abd al-Razack (Yemenite Front)
 Muris (Discovered Islam)
 Musa Adnan
 One Dawah
 Rumzi (Dawah Over Dunya)
 Sunnah Discourse
 Warner (I am The Warner)
 Wesam al Mahdi (Beyond Doubt Theology)
 Yusuf Ponders
 Zakir Hussain

May Allah guide us all to what is correct and may peace and blessings be upon the Messenger of Allah.

___________________________________________

_{1 https://odysee.com/1:988a?r=SQPVtbAJxE7nV98CGrqsdo6q7KJyh9bc
2 https://odysee.com/2:8df?r=SQPVtbAJxE7nV98CGrqsdo6q7KJyh9bc
3 https://odysee.com/3:1db?r=SQPVtbAJxE7nV98CGrqsdo6q7KJyh9bc
4 https://youtube.com/watch?v=APA0htT-AV0
5 https://odysee.com/5:f54?r=SQPVtbAJxE7nV98CGrqsdo6q7KJyh9bc
6 https://x.com/Haqiqatjou/status/2000594137893003514 ; https://imgur.com/a/p0fSHbe
7 https://x.com/Haqiqatjou/status/1936867217548927130 ; https://imgur.com/a/AV8rIDP
8 https://x.com/Haqiqatjou/status/1879575882546700489 ; https://imgur.com/a/9uJABLR;
https://x.com/Haqiqatjou/status/1885672984557310346 ; https://imgur.com/a/tFYYLJv
9 https://odysee.com/8:2d1?r=SQPVtbAJxE7nV98CGrqsdo6q7KJyh9bc
10 https://x.com/Haqiqatjou/status/1891685191455781091; https://imgur.com/a/V1HLlhP}

Let that sink in.

Two men who agreed apostates should die now believe each other IS an apostate. Under their own rules, they should both be executed. Each has convinced his followers that the other is a dangerous heretic leading Muslims astray.

Since then, the disdain between them has only escalated with more public debates and them doubling down on their positions toward each other.

Here’s what followers of these figures need to grapple with: Who decides?

Who gets to determine who is right? Who’s the final authority on orthodoxy? Daniel says Jake is a deviant who should be killed. Jake says Daniel promotes polytheism and should be killed. Both cite hadith. Both cite scholars. Both claim the mantle of authentic Sunni Islam.

So who’s right?

You might say, “The scholars decide.” But which scholars? Daniel and Jake each have scholars whom they appeal to for their understanding. Not only do those scholars contradict each other, but how they should be interpreted is also up for debate, as seen in their ongoing debates. Additionally, some scholars throughout history have said X is apostasy; others have said it’s not. When scholars disagree, and the penalty is death, who gets the final say?

Daniel and Jake, despite both being Sunni, hold opposing views. They’re both appealing to the same texts and declaring each other heretics worthy of death.

You might say “the righteous ruler decides.” But how do you determine who’s righteous? By what standard? And what happens when that ruler disagrees with your interpretation? What happens when YOU become the apostate in the ruler’s eyes?

This is exactly what one would expect from Sunni Muslims who are trying to uphold their doctrine to the letter, where the punishment for “apostasy” is death. Particularly when wrong belief or blasphemy is enough to have one considered an apostate.

Any system that prescribes death for incorrect belief is guaranteed to produce exactly what we’re seeing:

1. Endless fragmentation. Once you establish that wrong beliefs deserve death, every theological disagreement becomes existential. You can’t agree to disagree. You can’t have diversity of thought. Every difference is a threat that must be eliminated.

2. Authoritarian power grabs. Whoever controls the state controls who lives and dies. The accusation of apostasy becomes the ultimate political weapon. Disagree with the ruler? You’re an apostate. Challenge the religious establishment? Apostate. Try to reform anything? Apostate, apostate, apostate.

3. Purge after purge. Even if you start with a “pure” Islamic state, it will immediately begin eating itself. Someone will interpret something differently. Someone will be accused. Factions will form. Each faction will declare the others deviant. The executions begin, and they never stop.

This isn’t theoretical. We’ve watched it happen throughout history. The early Islamic civil wars (fitnas). The Khawarij declaring everyone else apostates and being killed themselves. The Sunni-Shia split that killed hundreds of thousands. The Ottoman executions of Sufi reformers. The Saudi persecution of different Islamic movements. The ISIS genocide against other Muslims.

The system demands blood, and it’s never satisfied.

If you’re a follower of Sunni Islam, please understand: Under their system, you are not safe.

You might think, “I’m following the right interpretation, so I’ll be fine.” But that’s what Jake thought about Daniel. That’s what Daniel thought about Jake. They were allies! They sat on that podcast together, united in their belief that apostates deserve death.

Now they consider each other apostates.

What makes you think you’re immune? What makes you think your interpretation will forever align with whoever ends up in power? What makes you think you won’t one day say the wrong thing, believe the wrong hadith interpretation, follow the wrong scholar, and find yourself on the wrong end of the accusation?

In true Sunni Islam, there is no safety. There is no room for growth, change of mind, or honest questioning. There is only: believe correctly (according to whoever has power) or die.

Think about what this means for your future. For your children’s future.

Imagine living in the Islamic state Daniel or Jake envisions. You study Islam deeply. You care about getting it right. But you read a scholar who convinces you of interpretation A. Your neighbor reads a different scholar who convinces him of interpretation B.

These interpretations contradict each other in a way that one side considers apostasy.

What happens? Does the state execute you? Does it execute your neighbor? Both? How is this determined? By the local imam? The religious court? The police? And when their decision is final, when appeal means accusing the judge of apostasy, what recourse do you have?

Your children grow up in this world. They ask questions—children do. “But why, father? Why can’t we…” Stop. That question might be heresy. That curiosity might be deviance. Better to teach them not to think, not to question, not to wonder. Just obey. Just believe. Just hope you’re obeying and believing the right things according to whoever’s in power this decade.

This is the world they’re building for you. A world where a curious mind is a dangerous liability. Where your children can’t grow, can’t explore, can’t develop their own understanding of God. Where fear replaces faith and submission replaces sincere conviction.

Here’s what should make everything click into place: Daniel and Jake can only advocate for this system because they live in a society that rejects it.

Daniel and Jake both live in societies that do not uphold the apostasy laws they advocate. Therefore, they can enjoy the freedom to promote their ideology. To practice their religion as they deem fit without fear of the state executing them. The freedom to have these debates, to call each other apostates, to publicly denounce each other—and nobody dies.

If they lived under the system they want to create, at least one of them would be dead right now. Probably both, because in the ensuing civil war between their factions, there are no winners, only victims.

They are alive because the societies they live in have not adopted their death cult ideology. The liberal values they despise—tolerance, freedom of conscience, the marketplace of ideas—these are the only things standing between them and the executioner’s blade their own ideology demands.

They are living, breathing proof that their system doesn’t work. They are the paradox made flesh: advocates of religious totalitarianism who survive only because they’re protected from religious totalitarianism.

And they’re asking you to help them build the cage that will eventually imprison you.

If you’re a Sunni Muslim, you need to recognize the death cult you are in when it is taken to its logical conclusions.

It is a system that promises to execute people for their thoughts, which is not divine guidance—it’s a machine designed to produce corpses.

Real faith doesn’t require violence to sustain itself. Real truth doesn’t need to threaten death to maintain adherence. Real Submission (Islam) can thrive in free societies where people choose their beliefs willingly.

The Islam that needs executions to survive isn’t strong. It’s desperately weak. It’s an ideology so fragile that a single person changing their mind is treated as an existential threat requiring murder.

You deserve better than this. Your children deserve better than this. The world deserves better than this.

Here’s a simple test: Would you want to live in a society run by someone who disagrees with your interpretation of Islam if they had the power to execute apostates?

Would you want to live under Daniel’s Islamic state if you believe Jake’s interpretation? Would you want to live under Jake’s Islamic state if you believe Daniel’s interpretation? Would you want to live under a Salafi interpretation if you’re Sufi? Under a Shia interpretation if you’re Sunni?

If the answer is no—and it should be no—then you’ve just discovered why the apostasy law is evil. Because you’re not always going to be the one in power. Your interpretation is not always going to be the one deemed “orthodox.” And when it’s your turn to be called the apostate, when it’s your neck on the line, you’ll suddenly understand why freedom of belief isn’t weakness—it’s wisdom.

Daniel and Jake are doing something valuable, even if they don’t realize it. They’re demonstrating, in real time, exactly why their ideology is poison.

Two intelligent men, both studied in Islamic texts, both convinced of their righteousness, both willing to kill for their beliefs—and they want each other dead.

If Islam needs this system to survive, then Islam cannot survive. If the truth needs executions to maintain itself, it’s not truth—it’s tyranny.

Watch what happens when the death cult runs out of outsiders to threaten. Watch what happens when the executioners turn on each other.

It’s time for people to walk away from Sunni Islam and find a belief system that doesn’t require corpses to sustain itself. Find teachers who don’t think your questions deserve death. Find a path where your children can wonder, doubt, question, and grow without fearing for their lives.

The fact that Daniel and Jake are both still alive, still debating, still free to spread their poisonous message despite each considering the other a heretic, is the strongest possible argument against everything they believe.

They are alive because their vision failed.

Don’t help them succeed.